Retired MLB star Jose Canseco lost a finger (again) during a poker competition week that is last.
Jose Canseco was the figure that is central a weekend for the poker world which was filled with fingers: some lost, some pointed at prominent names into the poker community. In Canseco’s case, he appears to have lost the finger that is same the 2nd time in of a month, something which few individuals (with any luck) will ever get to experience.
In late October, Canseco ended up being in the headlines for accidentally shooting himself in the hand. According to Canseco, the incident happened while he was cleansing his gun in his kitchen. He wound up shooting their little finger, which then must be surgically reattached. It appears some surgeons are more skilled than others at digital fixes, though.
Finger Comes Off During Poker Tournament
Based on a tweet sent out by Canseco on however, the finger became detached again while he was playing in a poker tournament Thursday evening friday.
‘ I happened to be playing in a poker tournament night that is last my hand fell of,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘Someone took a video clip of it.’
Fortunately, Canseco didn’t post that video, though there clearly was at least one supposed image of his finger before it dropped off. As gruesome due to the fact incident may sound, however, Canseco said that this outcome was inevitable from the time he shot himself.
‘My hand must have been amputated right from the start,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘It was very loose with no bone to get in touch it. It ended up being also smelling really bad.’
There was no expressed word on whether or not Canseco won the hand to create up for losing the little finger. Formerly, Canseco’s fingers were best-known for gripping bats during their 17-year major league career as a professional baseball player, during which he hit 462 house runs.
Colman Gives Hellmuth the Communicative Finger
Meanwhile free slot machine quick hits, One Drop winner Daniel Colman was pointing a finger, still firmly attached, of his own at 13-time World Series of Poker bracelet winner Phil Hellmuth. Colman made some harsh comments about Hellmuth in a thread concerning the latter’s current look for a podcast hosted by Rounders journalist Brian Koppelman.
‘Its embarrassing that we need to share our profession with whores like this guy,’ Colman wrote. ‘After I win one drop, he immediately comes on stage to shake my turn in front of the camera and congratulate me. As if he’s the gatekeeper to your poker world and welcoming me in.
‘It is truly pathetic that a 40 year old would behave the way he does at the table, not to mention how spineless he is, just willing to take any sponsorship no matter what the organization’s integrity,’ the $22 million winner waxed on. ‘ Really makes me sad to think there’s a chance some social people may look as much as this charlatan. People of his mindset and character are a cancer to this global globe.’
Hellmuth was apparently hurt and surprised by the comments, and responded briefly to them on Twitter.
‘Ouch, I was simply assaulted big time on a terrific poker forum,’ Hellmuth tweeted. ‘It was personal and it hurts, but I am proud regarding the man I will be!’
For his part, Colman later admitted that his choice of language was a bit too harsh, and chose to back the tone off of his post, also if he stood behind the message.
‘we acknowledge to being too harsh in my initial post. Phil didn’t deserve that hateful of the message,’ Colman later wrote. ‘Having said that, I still stand by the main gist of my post. Phil’s behavior in poker is atrocious, and I don’t think it belongs in this game.’
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver Pushing for Legal US Sports Betting
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver claims that US sports that are legal ought to be regulated in america. (Image: USATSI)
Can legal US activities betting, across the board, ever be a thing? a proponent that is surprising emerged in the form of NBA Commissioner Adam Silver.
Commissioner Silver penned an op-ed for The nyc Times recently, stating that he thinks it’s time to allow sports gambling to happen legally through the United States. That stance is in opposition compared to that on most major activities organizations in the USA, including the previously held position by the NBA and its former commissioner, David Stern.
‘Betting on professional recreations happens to be illegal in a lot of the usa outside of Nevada,’ Silver said at the start of their opinion piece. ‘I believe we need an alternative approach.’
Currently Prohibited in Most States
Silver went on to describe the state that is current of betting in the USA.
In 1992, Congress passed the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a piece of legislation that prohibited states from regulating sports betting, while grandfathering in four states that currently had some type of the betting available. Nevada could be the state that is only complete recreations betting, while Delaware, Montana and Oregon also provide the best to offer more restricted forms of sports-based gambling.
The NBA, along with other sports leagues and organizations in the US, has previously stood in opposition to legalizing sports betting for decades as silver states. But that hasn’t stopped individuals from gambling on the games, whatever the lack of the legal, regulated option.
‘But despite appropriate restrictions, sports gambling is extensive,’ Silver wrote. ‘It is a thriving underground business that operates free of regulation or oversight. Because there are few legal possibilities, those who wish to bet resort to illicit bookmaking operations and shady overseas internet sites.’
In accordance with Silver, some estimates place the volume of illegal activities betting in the United States at the maximum amount of as $400 billion per year. That dwarfs the total amount of appropriate activities betting that happens in Las Vegas gambling enterprises and other locations in Nevada.
Trends Point Towards Regulation
In the piece, Silver writes concerning the ‘domestic and trends that are global towards regulation of sports betting. He highlights that most states now offer at least some form of legal gambling, and that online gambling had been controlled in three states. Because of this, he says, it’s time for Congress to enact laws that are new replace PASPA.
‘Congress should adopt a federal framework that allows states to authorize betting on professional sports, subject to strict regulatory needs and technological safeguards,’ he wrote.
Silver has previously made reviews suggesting he would be interested in seeing regulated sports wagering in america, though this is actually the time that is first has presented his position in full. Other sports leagues declined to comment on Silver’s stance.
Cuban Backs Silver’s Stance
Nevertheless, one or more NBA owner has already sided with the commissioner. Outspoken Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban told CBSsports.com that ‘Adam has it exactly right.’
‘In the past for PR reasons, we have actually set up resistance that is token them,’ Cuban said. ‘I agree with Adam that now could be the time to take sports betting out from the shadows and deal along with it just like the huge business it is.’
Despite Silver’s reviews, however, New Jersey shouldn’t expect the NBA to pull out of the lawsuit that is aiming to stop the continuing state from allowing sports betting to continue at its casinos and racetracks.
‘Without a comprehensive solution that is federal state measures such as for example brand New Jersey’s recent initiative are going to be both unlawful and bad general public policy,’ Silver had written.
Ron Paul Rails Against Adelson On-line Poker Ban Arrange
Ron Paul laid out their arguments against an online gambling ban that has been highly supported by casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. (Image: David J. Phillip /AP)
Ron Paul has used his weekly column for the Ron Paul Institute to argue against an Internet gambling ban, saying that such legislation would curtail the freedom of Us citizens and is taken up limited to the benefit of casino owner Sheldon Adelson.
The previous Republican Representative from Texas called legislation that is such example of ‘cronyism,’ something he claims that most Americans are against irrespective of their political ideologies.
‘For instance, Congress may soon vote on legislation Internet that is outlawing gambling’ Paul published.
‘It is an open secret, at least within the Beltway, that this legislation is being considered as a favor to billionaire casino owner, Sheldon Adelson. Mr. Adelson, whom is perhaps best known for utilizing his enormous wealth to advance a pro-war international policy, is now using his political impact to turn his online competitors into criminals.’
Gambling Ban Introduced to Congress in March
Paul’s words make reference to the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA), a bill that ended up being introduced by Republicans both in homely houses of Congress in March, and contains since picked up little but notable amounts of bipartisan help in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The bill would outlaw most forms of online gambling during the level that is federal essentially changing the wording of the Wire Act to explicitly ban casino games and poker rather than just activities betting, because it is interpreted.
Paul spent much of his column dissecting and rejecting the reasons that are various for supporting the ban in an attempt to show that it was really only being considered with regard to Adelson.
‘Supporters of an Internet gambling ban publicly deny they are inspired with a desire to curry benefit with a donor that is wealthy’ Paul wrote. ‘ Instead, they give a true quantity of high-minded reasons for wanting to ban this activity. Some declare that legalizing online gambling will even enrich criminals and terrorists! But criminalizing casinos that are online not get rid of the need for online gambling enterprises. Rather, passage of this legislation will guarantee that the likely online gambling marketplace is managed by crooks.’
Paul Criticizes States’ Rights Argument
One of the major (and to numerous, perplexing) arguments utilized by supporters of RAWA is that such a ban would in fact protect states’ rights. Paul explained their argument before laying away his reasoning for why it was faulty.
‘Their argument is that citizens of states that ban Internet gambling may easily get around those legislation by accessing online casinos operating in states where online gambling is legalized,’ Paul stated. ‘ Even if the argument had merit that permitting states to legalize online gambling undermines laws in other states, it wouldn’t normally justify federal legislation on the issue…arguing that ‘states liberties’ justifies creating new federal crimes turns the Tenth Amendment, which ended up being intended to restrict federal energy, on its mind.’
Paul presented several more arguments against the legislation before summarizing his opposition to an online gambling ban.
‘The proposed ban on Internet gambling is an infringement that is blatantly unconstitutional our liberties which will probably expand the surveillance state,’ he concluded. ‘Worst of all, it is all being done for the benefit of one powerful billionaire.’
RAWA is unlikely to receive a hearing or see much movement in Congress throughout the current lame duck session. However, its prospects could improve in the next Congress, whenever Republicans will have majorities in both your house and Senate.