Las Vegas Sands NFL Stadium Bid Gathers Steam

Las Veg<span id="more-5659"></span>as Sands NFL Stadium Bid Gathers Steam

Sheldon Adelson (right) with Oakland Raiders owner Mark Davis. LVS wants to bring NFL to Las Vegas using a $1.2 billion stadium.

The Las Vegas Sands’ bid to woo an important recreations team to Las Vegas with a proposed $1.2 billion stadium may only be a couple of weeks old, but it is already momentum that is gathering.

According to the Las Vegas Review-Journal (LVRJ), Ed Roski, who has the Majestic Reality Company that has partnered with LVS regarding the project, met with Nevada’s top development that is economic to discuss the stadium this week. Steve Hill is chairman associated with Southern Nevada Tourism Infrastructure Committee, body, by all reports, with the power to approve $1.2 billion stadiums.

Hill’s committee will formally hear the proposal next month, on March 24th, and will issue a recommendation by July 31st.

LVS wants to build the stadium that is 65,000-seat a UNLV-owned 42-acre plot north of McCarran International airport. The university recently purchased the land for $50 million, and the stadium would become the true home of the UNLV university football group.

No NFL Prohibition on Las Vegas

LVS is hoping that it will also get to be the true home associated with the Oakland Raiders, a group looking for a stadium. The Raiders’ rent expires regarding the Oco Coliseum in Oakland month that is next. LVS Chairman Sheldon Adelson met Raiders owner Mark Davis recently to talk about the possibility.

Soon after that conference, a memo was circulated by the NFL to its franchisees instructing them on what they should react to press inquiries about Adelson’s approach.

Based on the memo, the official line is that ‘there isn’t any prohibition under league rules for a team moving to any specific town,’ suggesting that the presence of legal sports gambling in Nevada would not influence nevada’ chances within the light of the league’s strict anti-gambling stance.

While many Sin City residents would welcome the idea of a major sports team making the city its home for the time that is first numerous are less excited about making use of public cash to fund such a project.

Public Cash Would Provide Bulk of Funding

And while Adelson insisted that he’d place up the ‘lion’s share’ of this costs, on closer inspection, this doesn’t be seemingly the case. a financing that is preliminary calls for $780 million in public money, while LVS will pony up $420 million, although this plan isn’t final, says LVS.

Things seem to be moving quickly. LVS Senior Vice President of Government Relations Andy Abboud told the Review-Journal last week that the company would be ‘moving forward with the stadium concept with or with no NFL team,’ but he might be getting in front of himself.

Regardless any general public backlash over the funding derivation, UNLV Regent Michael Wixom told the LVRJ that the arena still needs to be approved by the university board.

‘While a stadium was discussed by some at the time being a feasible usage for the property, the board has not authorized any stadium plans. Neither does it have any agreement with any ongoing party for the construction or development of a stadium,’ he stated.

Brand New Hampshire Voters Choose Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump in First-in-the-Nation Primary

Bernie Sanders, right, and Donald Trump are leaving New England on the top of the respective primaries after New Hampshire voters heavily favored the Democrat and Republican 2016 presidential contenders. (Image: Joe Raedle/Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Pictures)

New Hampshire voters spoke noisy and clear on Tuesday with America’s very first primary that is presidential of 2016 cycle club player casino bonus codes. What they said is that they aren’t searching for the old-fashioned candidate to be their next president, regardless of party.

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, and billionaire that is republican Donald Trump, each won their particular primaries with decisive wins.

Sanders received 60 percent of the Democratic vote to Hillary Clinton’s 38.3 %, while Trump pounced his challengers with 35.2 % to Ohio Governor John Kasich’s 15.8, Texas Senator Ted Cruz’s 11.7, and Florida that is former Governor Bush’s 11.1 percent.

It was an evening that is dominating Sanders and Trump, and both needed the landslide victories to retain their energy because they now head to South Carolina and Nevada.

‘ We are going to make America great again!’ Trump declared uttering his campaign motto.

‘Tonight, with exactly what appears to be a voter that is record-breaking, because of a huge voter turnout, and I say huge, we won,’ Sanders said, mimicking the way Trump says ‘huge.’

Billionaire Battle

Clinton wasted no time in releasing a declaration on Tuesday night that said her campaign is anticipating to March, where states with a more demographic that is minority-centered participate. She additionally admitted she needs to complete more to connect with younger voters, as Sanders, who ironically is the candidate that is oldest operating in either celebration at 74, is dominating the youth vote. Clinton is 68.

Sanders’ rising popularity could entice billionaire Michael Bloomberg to enter the race. The New that is former York mayor has expressed desire for running and recently revealed he’s monitoring main results. Bloomberg, worth a reported $39 billion, would likely run being an independent.

Many political pundits believe Clinton is an candidate that is at-risk days, due to her ongoing email scandal. Sanders continues to be perceived as a shot that is long the general election, due to his socialist political views. That’s why continued strong results from Sanders are likely the key to Bloomberg throwing their title in to the ring.

A billionaire vs. billionaire 2016 presidential showdown would certainly make for an interesting election with Trump’s national popularity and stable polling numbers.

Candidate Casino

If gambling is an important issue in determining which candidate will receive your vote, here’s a rundown on one of the keys contenders for 2016.


Hillary Clinton: The former Secretary of State has been mixed on gaming. She publicly opposed casino development during her spouse’s governorship in Arkansas back in 1984, after which supported such development while a senator in brand New York. Clinton also voted and only the Internet that is unlawful Gambling Act (UIGEA) in 2006, the bill that outlawed the transmission of money online for gambling purposes.

Bernie Sanders: The Vermont politician hasn’t revealed much on his gambling place, though he too voted and only UIGEA.


Donald Trump: Trump was once in the casino business in Atlantic City with a few properties, but bailed from it prior to the nj-new Jersey gaming city began to sink financially. He is verbally pro gaming, both land-based and online, but as he is never held a political office, he doesn’t have a voting record.

Marco Rubio: The Florida Senator is championing the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) in Congress this year, the bill that could effectively block all forms of gambling online, and it is rumored that he might have Sheldon Adelson’s support, although that’s still undeclared.

Ted Cruz: The Texas senator’s primary focus is working against congressional ‘cronyism,’ and also the evangelist conservative would likely oppose bills like RAWA that extend the scope of federal government.

DraftKings Enters UK Market, Secures EPL Team Sponsorship

Arsenal’s Chief Commercial Officer, Vinai Venkatesham (left) with DraftKings’ Chief Executive Officer, Jason Robins, on the announcement of this sponsorship that is commercial between the two brands. (Image:

Daily fantasy sports (DFS) operator DraftKings rolled down its much-anticipated UK operations this week, the very first phase of a expansion plan that may see the Boston-based move that is start-up selected markets in Europe, Asia, and Latin America in 2016.

The move happens the heels of months of controversy in america, with state solicitors general and legislatures battling it out for or against DFS.

The daily fantasy sports market leader was able to raise almost $300 million to help finance its international ambitions, $150 million of which came from Fox Sports for an 11 percent stake in the company in July of last year.

The British platform is now real time, with players free to compete in 11 different sport categories, including American sports leagues like the NFL and NBA. However, DraftKings says it’s only too aware that Premiere League soccer are going to be the draw that is primary.

Arsenal, Liverpool, Watford Sponsorship

As a result, it has widened the scope of its soccer product for the UK market, broadening the scoring range to incorporate 18 different events that are in-game rather than the somewhat limited ‘goals,’ ‘saves’ and ‘assists’ categories of its previous offering.

DraftKings also announced that it had guaranteed partnership that is commercial three Premier League groups, in Arsenal, Liverpool and Watford, which will see the company brand presence throughout the lands during domestic events. DraftKings is likewise promoted through all the groups’ digital and social media channels.

‘We’re under no impression that our top three recreations here will not be anything else than football, football and football,’ stated Jeffrey Haas, an online gambling industry veteran, previously of PokerStars and, who may have been brought in to oversee the expansion. Haas called the British ‘a logical fit’ for DraftKings.

American ex-pats might be confused on US soil is referred to as ‘football’ in England if they play on DraftKings across the pond, because what’s called ‘soccer.

Problems at Residence

DraftKings announced it had received a license to operate in 2015 august. Since then, times have now been trying for the business in the US, as a lawsuit launched by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman seeks to shut down its operations in the Empire State, its biggest market.

The company had planned to launch in December of last year, but turmoil that is domestic ny along with other states postponed the move, because the company’s legal troubles mounted.

Whilst in New York, DraftKings’ lawyers argue that its competitions should be exempted from state gambling laws and regulations on the grounds that they’re skill-based and not gambling games, in the UK, the organization used for the gambling permit simply like any other operator.

This might be seized upon by opponents of DFS as an admission by the industry that the games are as much gambling as sports wagering is, but it addittionally suggests a willingness with this largely self-regulated industry to embrace regulatory oversight where such oversight exists.