Paddy Power Forced to Pull Offensive Oscar Pistorius Ad by Ad Authority

Paddy P<span id="more-5755"></span>ower Forced to Pull Offensive Oscar Pistorius Ad by Ad Authority

After having a record range complaints, a Paddy Power ad that featured alleged murderer Oscar Pistorius will be taken.

After fielding a record 5,200 complaints, Irish bookmaker Paddy Power has been forced to pull an offensive ad from its UK publications, because well as being investigated by the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA). The ad which many felt at best trivialized the current and ongoing murder trial of Paralympian Oscar Pistorius, and at worst exploited it for profit was ordered down previously this week by the ASA after being overwhelmed with input from horrified citizens.

Making Light of Pistorius Murder Trial

The print advertisement which had appeared in the press that is UK, also in the Paddy energy site and social media feeds offered chances on the outcome of the trial stating:


Pistorius’ face appeared photoshopped onto an Oscar statuette a mention of the recently aired Academy Awards, which had been held in la due to the fact murder trial got underway in South Africa. According to over 122,000 signatories of an online petition, however, Pistorius’ girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp’s alleged murder in February 2013 at the hands of her boyfriend should not be any laughing matter.

‘a woman that is young been killed,’ said Jean Hatchet, organizer of the petition. ‘There is no doubt that she was killed by this guy, whether or not he intended to kill her.’ The Paddy Power ad, she says, is ‘an incredibly awful, callous thing.’

It was said by the ASA would publish its findings and proffer any sanctions in due course. Meanwhile, the business was clear in its disdain for the message.

‘We consider the ad may be really prejudicial to the general public on the ground for the likely further serious and/or widespread offence it may cause,’ noted an ASA-issued statement that was released by the center of week. ‘We are also concerned that the reputation that is good of advertising industry may be further damaged by continued publication with this advertising.’

Paddy Power noted that the print campaign was only meant to perform together with the other day’s Oscars anyway, and claimed it only ran once in A uk paper sunday. Although the ASA said the Ireland-based company’s internet site had been away from its jurisdiction, a look at the site by late this week showed no trace of the ad whatsoever, nor any mention of its existence ever. A search of this company’s website’s betting options additionally revealed no matches for the word ‘Pistorius,’ though whether that indicates the bet is off is anyone’s guess.

Perhaps Not the Very First Offensive Ad from Paddy Power

Paddy energy with a reputation for this sort of risqué marketing campaign remained defiant, but seemed to totally miss the dimension that is moral telling media: ‘Trial betting as a whole isn’t a common event, but there is certainly nothing new about betting on the outcome of the absolute most high-profile court cases and they do not come any more high-profile than this. Given the rolling coverage of this test, pretty everyone that is much be speaing frankly about it and speculating on the verdict. We’re therefore expecting some of our customers to wish to place their money where their mouth is.’

Hatchet has requested that the earnings produced from the Pistorius bet should be donated to ladies’ charities, to which Paddy Power retorted: ‘we are offering gambling on the outcome of an effort. It is about whether Pistorius will likely be found bad or not guilty, it isn’t a gambling market on domestic physical violence.’

It’s far from 1st of numerous Paddy Power campaigns that deliberately seeks to court controversy.

The business was as soon as forced to pull billboard posters that showed Jesus and the Apostles gambling at the Last Supper. And in 2010, a television spot that showed a blind soccer player kicking a cat into a tree was probably the most complained about spot of this 12 months. The decision was also made to pull another TV spot that featured transvestites at a battle meet, and invited its customers to ‘spot the stallions among the mares’.

Of course, Paddy Power has achieved its objective that is real once: to force its brand into the papers and acquire people talking about its marketing campaigns. Nonetheless, at any given time when politicians in britain are questioning the amount of gambling ads on tv which they state can certainly be viewed by minors, this is certainly publicity that the gambling industry could do without probably.

Night Junior Middleweight Champ Molina Jailed Before MGM Garden Fight

Current IBF Junior Middleweight champ Carlos Molina during the MGM Grand Garden Arena back on Sept. 14, 2013. Molina is hoping to be released in time for Saturday’s match against undefeated Jermall Charlo. (Image: Mark Hundley/Las Las Vegas Sun)

UPDATE March 8, 2014: Carlos Molina was not released from Clark County Detention Center on and the Saturday MGM Grand Garden Arena fight was cancelled friday. It appears the main reason had been because technically Molina is considered an illegal alien and was desired by immigration officials, despite having lived in the U.S. since age four.

‘He’s not getting away from jail to fight, and we don’t understand as he is getting out,’ said Warriors Boxing promoter Leon Margules within an ESPN interview. ‘It’s because of his immigration status. He is an illegal alien.’


It’s a development that has promoters and bookmakers chewing through their nails: Carlos ‘King’ Molina’s scheduled defense of his IBF junior middleweight world title fight during the MGM Grand Garden Saturday against undefeated opponent Jermall Charlo might not go ahead because Molina was nevertheless in jail release that is awaiting we went along to press on Friday’s weigh-in time.

Arrested on Outstanding Warrants

Molina was arrested soon after his press seminar at the MGM Grand earlier in the week on a fugitive warrant, stemming from a 2007 parole violation for a deep failing to register as a sex offender. In 2002, he was convicted of second-degree assault on a minor in Outgamie, Wisconsin.

Meanwhile, it has also emerged that Appleton, Wisconsin police have a conduct that is disorderly out for him, dating back in to 2005.

On Thursday morning, Clark County prosecutor Bart speed consented to set Molina’s bail at $10,000 with the agreement of Wisconsin authorities; nonetheless, as Molina’s representatives scrambled to secure his release with time for the bout against challenger Jermall Charlo, he still needs to clear an immigration hold (he was born in Mexico, but has lived in the US since age four), and currently remains in Clark County Detention Center Las Las vegas’ main holding lockdown for bad boys.

Molina’s promoter, Leon Margules, said: ‘ an agreement was made by us with Wisconsin for the fighter’s release in the sex offender registration violation. The immigration problem is more complicated. We’m still trying to find out exactly why Carlos is being held. I am hopeful we could get it settled, get him released and acquire him in the ring Saturday. He told me he’s holding up well, but he wants to have out and he wants to fight Saturday.’

Monday Hearing Puts Fight in Doubt

The fact that records show that his next hearing has been set for this coming Monday throws that into doubt while authorities initially said they expected the boxer to be released in time for the fight.

At a press seminar on Thursday, Richard Schaefer, CEO of Golden Boy Promotions, stayed upbeat: ‘I’m waiting to hear from Molina’s people,’ he stated. ‘They’re managing all of Molina’s issues. We need not create a decision in the fight until the weigh-in (Friday). But I understand Carlos desires to fight. He is very anxious to get in the ring and he’s really fired up.’

However, Schaefer revealed that, should they don’t spring the miscreant champ from his jail mobile, he includes a back-up plan: ‘Just in case, this is just for the pay-per-view audience to know … if that battle does not take place, then we might, of course, have the luxury of going up Ricardo Alvarez against Thompson to the pay-per-view card.’

While audiences may be covered regardless, it’s a total headache for the bookmakers, obviously: collectively, millions of dollars in wagers pass through their hands on big Las Vegas battle nights and should this bout fail to materialize those bets could have to be returned.

Meanwhile, Molina’s opponent is trying to keep a clear head: ‘When I first heard it, I didn’t believe it,’ said Charlo. ‘I thought my trainer [Ronnie Shields] had been joking. But we’m going to keep everything that is doing same way as if we’re players paradise slots going to fight. I’ll stay concentrated. I want to stay in shape. I’m not likely to be distracted.’

Downtown Grand Sued When Man Loses $500K in Alleged Blackout State

52-year-old Mark Johnston from l . a . is suing the Downtown Grand in Las Vegas, after losing $500K wagering on Super Bowl weekend. Johnston claims he ended up being blacked out and did not know exactly what he was doing. (Image: CNN)

Did you do have a rough Super Bowl week-end, wagering-wise? Perhaps you bet in the Broncos, or maybe the blowout took all the full life out of your Super Bowl celebration. Whatever the case can be, you didn’t have the type of issues faced by one serious gambler in Las Vegas, who states he lost $500,000 over that week-end while he was much too inebriated to know very well what he had been doing.

Blackout Drunk Continued to Wager

That guy Mark that is 52-year-old Johnston from Los Angeles states that the Downtown Grand in Las Vegas’ Fremont Street area allowed him to gamble while he ended up being clearly drunk; blackout drunk, based on their own assessment. That lead to him losing half a million dollars at the pai blackjack and gow tables.

‘I feel just like they picked my pockets,’ said Johnston, a retiree from California. ‘I feel like they took a drunk guy…like a drunk guy walking down the street, and you reach in their pockets and grab all his money.

‘I am not just a loser that is sore. I have lost fifty per cent of a million. I have lost 800,000. I’ve lost bundle. This has nothing to do with that. Clearly I are able what I destroyed,’ said Johnston, who nonetheless refuses to classify himself as a ‘whale’ the industry term for a high-roller.

Johnston previously owned A southern california car dealership, and today owns a Mercedes-Benz worth $250,000; making his modesty regarding his gambling status a tad disingenuous.

Although he claims he’s not blacked out previously, he also claims to have been served 20-30 products, making one wonder how he can keep in mind that, but not his gambling play per se. Nevertheless the rich aren’t richer because they don’t know how to play hardball, and Johnston is no exception to that rule; he appears happy to play the victim card in this scenario than we are.

‘This is about you nearly killing me. What in me, and I threw up on myself and I choked and died?’ Johnston said, with a dramatic flair that we can only admire from afar if I had gone to bed that night, with all those drinks. That being said, also he fesses up to having had as 10 products while planing a trip to Vegas and in the limo before he even hit the video gaming floor.

‘ My obligation is, look, I’d some products at the airport, on the air plane. At some point, that is my obligation,’ the gambler stated. ‘The unfortunate part about it for them is, they have a bigger obligation than i actually do.’

Based on Johnston’s attorney Sean Lyttle, The Grand is countersuing in an effort to collect his customer’s debts; although other media sources have actually reported that the casino has agreed to settle at a 20 percent discount $400K but that Johnston will not go that path. Meanwhile, Johnston has placed a stop-payment order regarding the debt re payments The Grand was attempting to collect, and is particularly suing them for damaging their reputation.

Nevada Law Places Onus on Casinos

It works out that per Nevada legislation casinos are, in reality, prohibited from allowing gamblers that are visibly drunk continuing to wager cash. They truly are also supposed to take off the free drinks after they can inform somebody has received one a lot of. The grey area right here might be who determines what constitutes how many, and in what criteria. After all, if Johnston surely could place wagers also in a blackout state, he might be in as he claims how was the casino to know what impaired state?

However, regulatory authorities are taking the instance quite really. So as The Grand will not comment on pending litigation, Nevada’s Gaming Control Board is reportedly investigating the full case one that Lyttle claims is quite uncommon.

‘It’s certainly a case that is extraordinary’ Lyttle stated. ‘ This is not really a story that I’ve ever heard before, where someone was blackout intoxicated where they could not read their cards, and yet a casino continued to serve them beverages and issue them more markers. It’s a very heavy-handed and unusual approach that we haven’t seen in this town in quite a long time.’

In accordance with Johnston, he is a regular in Las Vegas and was invited to The Grand for Super Bowl weekend along with his gf, though he mostly gambled on his own. Their lawsuit alleges that The Grand offered him lots of free drinks that he didn’t realize how much he had lost until Sunday after he had already been drinking at dinner, and.

While Johnston lost big over Super Bowl weekend, he was not the only one. With most of the general public money in the Broncos, the Nevada sportsbooks won almost $20 million from gamblers on the NFL’s championship game this year after having a record amount of betting.